Case spotlight: Singh & Ors v Brisbane Sikh Temple (Gurdwara) Inc [2022] QSC 151
Litigation: 16 October 2025
Author: Aaron Stewart - Our People
Internal disputes within incorporated associations continue to test the limits of judicial intervention in Queensland. The Supreme Court decision in Singh & Ors v Brisbane Sikh Temple (Gurdwara) Inc [2022] QSC 151 highlights the Court’s careful approach when asked to resolve conflicts about membership and governance.
For community, sporting and cultural associations alike, the case underscores the importance of transparent decision-making and strict adherence to constitutional procedures.
What happened in this case
The dispute arose within a Queensland religious association after more than 2,000 individuals applied for membership. The management committee did not process or approve the applications, prompting several applicants to seek court orders, including the appointment of a receiver to manage the association’s affairs and convene meetings.
Justice Applegarth declined to appoint a receiver, noting that such an order is a drastic remedy reserved for cases where rights cannot otherwise be protected. His Honour emphasised that members must generally exhaust internal remedies under the association’s constitution and the Associations Incorporation Act 1981 (Qld) before seeking judicial intervention.
Why this matters for associations and their members
This decision reinforces that Queensland courts are reluctant to step into internal association disputes except in clear cases of misconduct or procedural breakdown.
Key takeaways include:
- Courts will intervene only as a last resort where internal remedies are inadequate or unavailable.
- Adherence to constitutional processes is essential for committees managing membership or governance disputes.
- Transparency and good records can help defend against claims of bias or exclusion.
- Receivership and injunctions remain exceptional measures for serious governance failures.
- For committees and office-bearers, the case is a timely reminder that robust internal governance and fair procedures are the best protection against litigation.
Aaron Stewart’s experience before the Supreme Court of Queensland
Our Brisbane Principal Lawyer, Aaron Stewart, has successfully represented associations and committee members in the Supreme Court of Queensland, achieving favourable outcomes including awards of costs.
Aaron’s work in this area has been noteworthy enough to attract media attention, demonstrating his strong reputation in handling complex association disputes. His experience includes:
- Acting for incorporated associations in disputes concerning governance and membership irregularities.
- Obtaining orders upholding the validity of committee decisions challenged by members.
- Successfully resisting applications for injunctions and other extraordinary remedies, with costs awarded in favour of his clients.
His practical understanding of association constitutions and the Associations Incorporation Act 1981 (Qld) enables him to resolve complex disputes efficiently — often protecting both the organisation’s reputation and its financial position.
How Aitken Partners can help
At Aitken Partners, we assist incorporated associations, not-for-profits and community organisations to manage governance challenges and membership disputes. Our Brisbane team works with clients to develop practical strategies that resolve conflict early and preserve relationships while ensuring compliance with legislative and constitutional requirements.
Get advice early
If your association is facing internal conflict, suspension or expulsion disputes, or challenges to its management decisions, early legal advice can help avoid escalation. Taking prompt, strategic steps can protect your association’s interests and reduce the risk of costly litigation.
Contact Aitken Partners
For strategic advice on association and governance disputes, contact Aitken Partners on (07) 3544 5659, or complete our online enquiry form and a member of our team will be in touch.